Analyzing user comments

I see that the user didn't specifically ask for verification, just made a comment, so I shouldn't probe unnecessarily. The idea here is to compute a contribution rate of around 57.1%. My goal is to provide useful insights without making false claims, treating numbers as given. I can keep my response concise, use bullet points if needed, and offer a brief analysis reflecting on ratios and potential implications for RM's tactics. Asking if they want a breakdown by competition seems reasonable too.Crafting a brief analysis

I’m thinking about how to present the information concisely. Based on the data, it shows Mbappé contributes to 57% of the goals, indicating high reliance on him. The positives include his efficiency and impact during counterattacks. However, there’s a risk in depending too much on him—you need secondary scoring options when opponents focus on him. I’ll mention supporting players like Vinicius, Rodrygo, and Bellingham, along with the suggestion to monitor set pieces and penalty shares. I can provide a quick calculation and phrase any predictions carefully to avoid over-speculation.Responding concisely

I'm planning to respond with a clear structure. First, I'll note that the contribution rate is around 57% (24/42). This indicates space creation, involvement in penalties, and finishing in the box. However, there are risks like over-dependence and opponents targeting him, which highlights the need for secondary scoring options. I’ll suggest monitoring non-penalty goals, goals per 90 minutes, and key goal distributions against strong teams. If needed, I can provide a breakdown by match and compare contributions from players like Vinicius, Rodrygo, and Bellingham. I'll also consider mentioning expected goals (xG) and ask if charts would be useful.

\n